COMPARISONS

GMGN vs Every Other Terminal

Head-to-head comparisons built on numbers you can check, not on affiliate payouts. The one most readers want first is GMGN vs Photon, and the three-way version adding the platform every ranking page still lists is GMGN vs Photon vs BullX. For the platform itself, start at the GMGNGuide homepage or the fee breakdown.

GMGN's Solana token page for Fartcoin: the candle chart and trade feed on the left, and on the right the buy panel with its amount presets, the priority-fee and Anti-MEV row under the Buy button, and the contract checks for top-10 holders, mint authority, blacklist and burn percentage. This is the screen the fee comparison on this page is actually about.
GMGN's Solana token page for Fartcoin: the candle chart and trade feed on the left, and on the right the buy panel with its amount presets, the priority-fee and Anti-MEV row under the Buy button, and the contract checks for top-10 holders, mint authority, blacklist and burn percentage. This is the screen the fee comparison on this page is actually about.

How we verified this

Last checked by hand
September 3, 2026. Every revenue figure was pulled fresh from the API on that date, and Azura's rate was read from its own fee documentation. The other platforms' rates were last re-read from their documentation on 2026-08-11 and are unchanged.
Who checked it
Concept211 (@Concept211), who writes and maintains this site. It is a one-person publication with no relationship to GMGN. A figure we could not reach a primary source for is labeled unverified on the page instead of estimated, and the re-check schedule is set out in the methodology. If something here looks wrong, tell us and we will re-check it.

Where the Numbers Come From

Every revenue figure on this page is DefiLlama trailing 30-day fee data, pulled on 3 September 2026, with the earlier 6 August and 11 August pulls kept wherever the ordering they produce differs. Every fee percentage is quoted from the platform's own documentation, or marked unverified where we could not reach that documentation. We print the source and the date because the rest of this category does not: the comparison pages currently ranking for these queries order their winners by affiliate rate and publish no dataset at all, which is how Photon ends up rated the best terminal of 2026 while collecting $0.75M against Axiom's $38.93M. If a figure here is unverified, we label it unverified rather than rounding it into a claim, and if DefiLlama does not track a platform we say that rather than printing a zero. The same data on one normalized basis, across 24-hour, 7-day, 30-day and lifetime windows, is in the terminal fee and market-share snapshot, which is the page to read if two outlets have told you different things about who leads this category.

What Does GMGN Bring to This Comparison?

GMGN is a multichain memecoin trading terminal and Telegram bot suite covering Solana, BSC, Ethereum, Base, Tron and Blast. It charges a flat 1% per trade, documented at one rate across every chain, with no subscription and no sniper surcharge. What you pay for is discovery and automation: the trenches and new-pair feeds, smart money and insider wallet tracking, wallet radar, the X tracker, contract security checks with honeypot detection, copy trading, limit orders, auto buy and sell, and trailing take-profit and stop-loss. The full picture is in what GMGN is, and the trading surface is covered in the trenches and sniper guide.

Which Terminal Is Cheapest Per Trade?

Almost everyone in this category is quoted at 1%, so the headline rate separates almost nothing across the middle of the table. It separates a lot at the edge. Azura's own fee documentation states a 0% platform fee on spot buys and sells, cross-chain swaps, trigger orders and Quick Buy. What you still pay there is execution cost: network gas, DEX routing fees of roughly 0.1% to 0.3% per pool set by the liquidity protocol, and a bridge fee on cross-chain swaps, all of which Azura's docs are explicit go to validators and liquidity providers rather than to Azura. Every terminal on this page routes through those same pools, so that cost is common to all of them and the 1% the others document sits on top of it. Among the platforms that do take a cut, what separates them is what happens to that 1% afterwards, which chains you can reach, and whether the automation you need exists. Axiom's documentation gives part of the fee back through volume tiers. Photon publishes no rebate. Several of the smaller terminals advertise cashback tiers we could not confirm from a primary source, which is a reason to check the offer yourself rather than to trust a comparison table, this one included.

Why Can't a Zero-Fee Terminal Rank in a Fee Table?

Because revenue rank and cost to the trader are two different measurements that happen to move together for most of this cohort, and come apart completely at zero. A terminal that takes no cut collects no fees, so a table ordered by fee revenue can only render it as $0.00M, below BONKbot, which reads as irrelevant when it means free. That is a flaw in ranking by revenue, not a finding about the platform. The fee model column exists so the two questions stay apart: the revenue column answers how much of this category a platform captures, and the model column answers what it charges you. Azura is the case that made the gap visible, and it carries no revenue figure at all rather than a zero, because DefiLlama does not track it: we checked the full protocol list on 3 September 2026 and Azura is not among the 8,179 entries. We have no independent measure of its size, and the table says so instead of implying one.

Which Terminal Suits Which Trader?

GMGN documents no user-side rebate at all, and the difference goes into chain coverage and tooling, which is a defensible trade if you trade BSC or Base and a poor one if you only trade Solana. Price your own case with the all-in trade cost calculator and against the GMGN fee guide, where priority fees and tips usually turn out to cost small traders more than the 1% does.

Which Is the Best Memecoin Trading Terminal in 2026?

Read this with its dates attached, because the top of this category has changed hands twice in a month. On DefiLlama trailing 30-day fees as of 6 August 2026, Axiom led at $22.35M against GMGN's $9.31M. On the same trailing series as of 11 August, GMGN read $25.04M against Axiom's $24.34M. On 3 September 2026 Axiom leads again at $38.93M against GMGN's $35.37M, on a cohort that has roughly doubled since the first reading, from $45.30M across these nine rows to $100.04M. What holds across all three is the shape of the trade-off. Axiom is the cheaper published rate of the two, its documented tiers running 0.95% down to 0.75% against GMGN's flat 1%. GMGN is the terminal in this cohort with meaningful volume outside Solana: on the 3 September pull it sat fourth on Solana alone at $4.69M, behind Axiom, fomo Wallet and Pump.fun's Terminal, which puts about $30.7M of its $35.37M on BSC, Ethereum, Base and the rest, and it ships copy trading, smart money tracking and contract security checks. Photon, Trojan, Maestro, Moonshot and BONKbot each collected under 4% of GMGN's fees on that window. The cheapest published rate in the table belongs to neither leader: Azura documents a 0% platform fee, and is new enough that DefiLlama does not track it yet, so it cannot be sized against the rest here. For most traders the practical choice is between Axiom on price, GMGN on chain coverage and automation, and Azura if a zero platform fee outweighs trading with an unmeasured venue. The full dated series across four windows is in the terminal fee and market-share snapshot.

Terminal Fees and 30-Day Revenue, Side by Side

Revenue is DefiLlama trailing 30-day fees, pulled 3 September 2026. These are the whole cohort any rank on this page is measured against, ordered by that revenue, with the one platform DefiLlama does not track placed last rather than given a zero. Rates are quoted only where we reached the platform's own primary source; the rest read unverified. Fee model is a separate column because a platform that charges nothing cannot be read off a revenue ranking.

PlatformFee model30d feesTrading fee
AxiomVolume-tiered$38.93M1% base, 0.95% to 0.75% by volume tier (Axiom fee docs)
GMGNFlat rate$35.37M1% flat, no tiers (GMGN fee docs)
fomo WalletNot published$16.79MNot published
Terminal (Pump.fun)Unverified$5.27MUnverified, no primary source reached
MaestroUnverified$1.38MUnverified, no primary source reached
TrojanUnverified$1.19MUnverified, no primary source reached
PhotonFlat rate$0.75M1% flat (Photon’s own interface)
MoonshotUnverified$0.26MUnverified, no primary source reached
BONKbotUnverified$0.10MUnverified, no primary source reached
AzuraZero platform feeNot tracked0% platform fee, execution costs separate (Azura fee docs)

Azura carries no revenue figure because DefiLlama has no adapter for it: we checked the full protocol list on 3 September 2026 and it is not among the 8,179 entries. That is an absence of measurement, not a measurement of zero, and it is why the row sits outside the ranking rather than at the bottom of it. BullX is left out of the table entirely. Its DefiLlama fee line reads $738, which we read as a broken adapter summing one-lamport markers rather than a revenue collapse, so publishing it would be wrong in the other direction. fomo Wallet publishes no fee page we could find, so its rate is listed as not published rather than guessed. Earlier pulls of the same trailing 30-day series read GMGN $9.31M against Axiom $22.35M on 6 August 2026 and GMGN $25.04M against Axiom $24.34M on 11 August, a different ordering at the top of this table on figures five days apart; each is printed with its date rather than merged.

Every Comparison, One Line Each

The short answer for each rival. Linked rows have a full breakdown behind them.

PlatformVerdict
PhotonOn the 30 days to 3 September 2026, GMGN collected roughly 47 times Photon’s fees, $35.37M against $0.75M, and both showed a 1% rate on their own surfaces. Photon’s fee line has fallen steeply across that series while the product remains open and trading.
AxiomThe lead has changed hands twice in a month. Axiom led on the 30 days to 6 August 2026 at $22.35M against $9.31M, GMGN led on the 30 days to 11 August at $25.04M against $24.34M, and on the 30 days to 3 September Axiom leads again at $38.93M against $35.37M. What has not moved is the rate: Axiom’s tiered 0.95% to 0.75% sits below GMGN’s flat 1%. GMGN answers on BSC, Base and Ethereum coverage plus copy trading.
TrojanSolana only, and about 3% of GMGN’s fees over the 30 days to 3 September 2026, $1.19M against $35.37M. Its rate and its Arena cashback tiers are widely quoted but we could not confirm either from a primary source, so we do not restate them.
MaestroBroad chain coverage and $1.38M over the 30 days to 3 September 2026, which is a tripling since the 6 August window and enough to put it back above Trojan. Its published rate and its paid tier are quoted inconsistently across comparison sites and we could not reach a primary source, so we leave both unverified rather than pick a version.
BONKbotSolana only, and flat at $0.10M over the 30 days to 3 September 2026, unchanged from the 6 August window. GMGN offers wallet tracking and multichain reach that BONKbot’s documentation does not describe. BONKbot’s rate is unverified here.
BullXIts DefiLlama fee line read $192 in August and $738 on 3 September 2026, which reads to us as a broken adapter rather than revenue, because it sums one-lamport markers. Volume is still measurable elsewhere, so treat BullX as diminished rather than dead.
AzuraThe only platform here documenting a 0% platform fee, on spot, cross-chain swaps, trigger orders and Quick Buy, with gas and DEX routing costs still payable to the chains and pools. It carries no revenue figure because DefiLlama does not track it, so it cannot be ranked against the rest on the measure this page uses. Newest entrant in the cohort and the cheapest published rate in it.

Axiom comes up in almost every one of these comparisons and has its own dedicated site in this family: axiompedia.com, which covers its tier table and cashback mechanics in more depth than a row here can.

Trade on GMGN With Code ggguide

Our referral code is ggguide. GMGN pays us a share of the 1% fee you already pay, and the rate you pay does not change either way. No discount, no bonus, no catch.

Open GMGN